….in fact they all flop. Bring back Amla.
….in fact they all flop. Bring back Amla.
Do you never learn not to post garbage on site.
Rescued by32 year old David Miller…the man both Peeper and Quisling wanted to drop. Hahahaha….morons.
Miller did very extremely well for a change and the rescue job was helped along by Mulder and even de Kock. Your concentration on Markram and not seeing the flop of Van der Dussen is weird. LMAO.
Not really. Nobody is punting van der Dussen. He’s just a fill in until we get some talent. Markram by contrast has been heavily promoted you and the Quisling. What a mess you are!
But then there is this.......
"The rest barring Faf and Rabada were just out their depth. Has there ever been a more disappointing bat than Miller."
Miller has BMT and these days it only ever shows up in T20s.
He never really took off and perhaps he was never going to considering his role and and style. Pretty much par for the course. His career isn't a fail nor is it epic.
However, and again, look at the success the slow bowlers found.
And I posted previously, where is the value in all out pace bowlers in T20?
Especially when they'll open the bowling during the mandatory powerplay.
Pace off the ball and batting all the way to 9 or 10 is the answer. Shamsi at 11, Kagiso at 10, all-rounders from 9 to 7 and everybody else specialist bats with perhaps a guy like Markram that can turn his arm over if necessary.
"Rescued by32 year old David Miller…the man both Peeper and Quisling wanted to drop. Hahahaha….morons."
Hmmm . . . I thought this comment was a bit odd because I don't follow cricket as closely as I used to and I seldom post on it. Also, I couldn't recall ever saying that David Miller should be dropped from limited overs squads but I thought I'd do a quick check, so I typed "site:ruckersforum miller" into Google. As I thought, Moffie's claim is nothing but another stinking lie from the geriatric old drunkard because I couldn't find a single instance where I even mentioned David Miller let alone suggested dropping him . . . but I did find this hilarious post from Moffie titled "Miller flops again" where he describes Miller as follows . . .
"Great ball striker when there is no pressure....perennial flop when the pressure is on."
He's falsely accusing me of dissing Miller without providing any evidence to support his lie while I'm providing evidence of him calling Miller a perennial flop.
This reminds me a lot of Moffie's recent claim that he was the person on this board who "discovered" Cheslin Kolbe when in fact he was probably the last to appreciate Cheslin Kolbe and said he would never make it as a test rugby player.
Sometimes it's hard to imagine just how insecure and needy one has to be to make these claims and pretend you always got everything right when in reality you're just an opinionated liar with a desperate need for appreciation or admiration from fawning and obsequious little toadies.
Anyway, let's see if Moffie can find this example of me wanting David Miller dropped from a limited overs side or if he mimics ou Maaik yet again and casually tells these blatant lies without ever providing any evidence. I've always said our two septuagenarian squabblers are a lot more similar than either one would care to admit.
mozart is confusing himself again. I ridiculed the emphasis he placed on the '32 year old player' on the same day another 32 year old player failed. T his mania with age that caused the star of the thread - no wonder Mozart is indeed an age maniac.
Actually I meant Pervert and Quisling.. ..what a pity you had to dig through the entrails of the Board to try and find your comments on Miller based on an error . How much time did you spend Peeper ….half an hour, more?
And just in case you want an apology Tit, apologize for your disgraceful misrepresentation of my RSA departure and I’ll apologize for my typo.
So let me just get this straight . . . you meant to type the word "pervert" but you ended up typing the word "peeper" instead . . . and now you would have us believe that you didn't confuse two different posters, it was in fact just a typing error and it's just a one in a billion coincidence that your "typo" resulted in the name that you call another poster?
Yes? Is that what you'd have us believe rather than admit you confused two posters?
You do know what a "typo" is don't you Moffie? Are you quite sure it wasn't a "braino" . . . or in your case, more likely a "blotto"?
Do I confuse you and Pervert? Well you two are like green assed flies buzzing around me all day so I suppose I could be excused. You both desperately need to win one off me after all these years.
But no….you are a spiteful loser who hates himself and his life. Pervie is a guy who desperately wants to be loved. All he needs is a bit of stroking and he immediately agrees with that person.
You don’t want to be loved because in your little black heart you know that you don’t deserve it and any approval is misplaced. But I loom so large in your life, you would love my approval of anything you say……it might just change your own view of yourself ?
Two broken green assed flies buzzing around me….LMAOFY!
You seem totally confused lately and your brain has gone poofter like you are all the time. If there is one who oppose your dishonest comments on site and debunks your BS, you cannot take it and return to hateful tactics. . See where your prejudice has taken you - it is just hilarious if it was not so tragic..
Hahaha….hateful tactics….what a woke fella you are Pervert.
Whoever the drunken old fool was talking to, doesn't change the fact that he's having a little pop at the people who criticised Miller when he himself called him a perennial flop.
How sad and lifeless do you have to try bolster your own self-esteem by slagging off other posters for saying what you're pretending you didn't say yourself?
Ah the other green assed fly……actually I don’t rate Miller, never have. We had better players 5 years ago. But relative to the pickings today, he is probably a logical choice. Context Peeper, you missed the point as usual. Console yourself with another gin and a few cans of beer Lush.